A plan for Sensible
Development
Bennington Banner
editorial
Sabina Haskell, Editor
July 5, 2004
The Bennington Planning Commission is about to advise the select
board to enact stringent zoning bylaws to tame big-box retailers
looking to do business in the area.
Some of the regulations call for stores thinking of facilities
larger than 20,000 feet to study the impact of such a store on the
community - 20,000 feet is about one-third the size of the Price
Chopper.
The businesses would have to study the effects on property taxes
and jobs, among other impacts. Other regulations would cap the
size of stores in the commercial area of town, along Northside
drive, at 75,000 square feet, and stores along Benmont Avenue
would be capped at 50,000 square feet. There would be no cap
downtown to encourage development there.
The regulations are a smart way of framing the future of
development in our town. Encouraging downtown development by
making it easier to do business in that part of town will
revitalize Main Street. However, we will need to be careful that
any development downtown is in tune with the rest of the downtown.
Just because we allow larger buildings doesn't mean they should be
ugly or soulless.
Some planners are already saying the Bennington model could be the
envy of other towns trying to cope with the course of development
that has brought mammoth stores and local fears that Vermont's
historical character is dying.
In May, Vermont was named to a list of endangered historic places
by National Trust for Historic Preservation. This was the second
time Vermont has made this list because the organization says
Vermont is in danger of losing its historic charm. This time on
the list the organization directly points a finger at big-box
stores as the main threat.
The organization says that big-box development causes sprawl in
small communities (an issue Bennington is no stranger to), and the
stores come with economic costs like stifling competition and
overwhelming the landscape. The best advice National Trust has for
communities like Bennington is to entertain the notion of big-box
development but proceed with caution.
The regulations being drafted by our planners are wise for
handling Bennington's need for competitive retail, historic
significance, small-town character and controllable growth. We
will go forward with our eyes fully open and by placing the burden
on large retailers to prove their worth we know companies serious
about doing business here will know that we also mean business:
Careless companies need not apply.
|